AEM Early Access 34: Predictive Accuracy of Electrocardiographic Monitoring of Patients with Syncope in the Emergency Department: The SyMoNE Multicenter Study

Welcome to the thirty-fourth episode of AEM Early Access, a FOAMed podcast collaboration between the Academic Emergency Medicine Journal and Brown Emergency Medicine. Each month, we'll give you digital open access to an recent AEM Article or Article in Press, with an author interview podcast and suggested supportive educational materials for EM learners.

Find this podcast series on iTunes here.

DISCUSSING (CLICK ON TITLE FOR FULL TEXT, OPEN ACCESS THROUGH JANUARY 31):

Predictive Accuracy of Electrocardiographic Monitoring of Patients with Syncope in the Emergency Department: The SyMoNE Multicenter Study. Monica Solbiati, MD, PhD, Franca Dipaola, MD, Paolo Villa, MD, Sonia Seghezzi, MD, Ivo Casagranda, MD, Filippo Rabajoli, MD, Elisa Fiorini, MD, Lorenzo Porta, MD, Giovanni Casazza, PhD, Antonio Voza, MD, Franca Barbic, MD, Nicola Montano, MD, PhD, Raffaello Furlan, MD , Giorgio Costantino, MD.

LISTEN NOW: INTERVIEW WITH AUTHOR Giorgio Costantino, MD

Giorgio Costantino, MD

Associate Professor

Internal Medicine and Emergency Medicine

University of Milan

ABSTRACT

Background: Arrhythmia is one of the most worrisome causes of syncope. Electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring is crucial for the management of non–low risk patients in the emergency department (ED). However, its diagnostic accuracy and optimal duration are unknown. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ECG monitoring in non–low risk patients with syncope in the ED.

Methods: This prospective multicenter observational study included adult patients presenting to the ED after syncope. Patients without an obvious etiology after ED evaluation who were classified by ED physicians as being at non-low risk of adverse events underwent ECG monitoring. We assessed sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic yield (defined as the proportion of patients with true-positive ECG monitoring findings) of ECG monitoring in the identification of 7- and 30-day adverse and arrhythmic events according to monitoring duration.

Results: Of 242 patients included in the study, 29 patients had 7-day serious outcomes. Ten additional patients had serious outcomes at 30 days. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic yield of ECG monitoring in the identification of 7-day adverse events were 0.55 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36–0.74], 0.93 (95% CI 0.89–0.96), and 0.07 (95% CI 0.04–0.10), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic yield of >12 h ECG monitoring in the identification of 7-day adverse events were 0.89 (95% CI 0.65–0.99), 0.78 (95% CI0.67–0.87), and 0.18 (95% CI 0.12–0.28), respectively. Similar results were observed for 30day adverse events. The median (interquartile range) ECG monitoring time was 6.5 h (6–15 h). ECG monitoring findings were positive in 31 patients.

Conclusions: Although the overall diagnostic accuracy of ECG monitoring is fair, its sensitivity at >12 h duration is substantially higher. These results suggest that prolonged (>12h) monitoring is a safe alternative to hospital admission in the management of non–low risk patients with syncope in the ED.